Let’s say the cost of a compliance program is worth $12,000 per year. How much is that?
It all depends on the item you’re replacing.
If you invest $12,000 to save hundreds of hours of repetitive evidence gathering in the complex technological world this could be money that is well-invested. If a company of seven could gather the same data by hand in just a few hours every month, the cost looks considerably different.
That’s a useful way to approach the search for a Vanta alternative. Do not begin by asking what platform comes with the greatest features. Find out how much time and effort those features could save your business.
Automation is an economic break-even Point
Automation of compliance isn’t necessarily either good or negative. Scale can alter its value. Imagine a company that is growing that has multiple cloud environments and numerous applications. The strain of manually gathering evidence continuously could become very difficult. Integrations which automatically monitor systems and collect evidence easily justify their costs.
Imagine a business with 10 people who are preparing to go through its initial SOC 2. audit. The system may be small, and evidence collection could remain manageable without significant automation.
Vanta pricing is based on this difference. The capabilities of a high-end platform are amazing, however they can only be of value for organizations that require them.
Compare Architecture and Not Just Brands
A search for Vanta or Drata will quickly turn into an exercise in feature-by-feature. Both are well-established software for compliance that is built around automation and integrations, so they can be compared in terms of supported frameworks, integrations, service, contracts, and individual quotes could prove useful to companies searching for that method.
There’s a second decision you need to make. Does your company want an integration-driven compliance platform in any way? Some businesses want automated evidence collection, as well as constant monitoring. Some businesses prefer to provide their own evidence, especially when their workload is small.
Vanta Competitors don’t all follow the same format.
Many well-known Vanta rivals compete in a category that has a similar focus on automation. There are also platforms that are less heavy focused on organization with the vast system connectivity.
CertAssist is a part of the latter category. Created by compliance experts and internal auditors, CertAssist organizes framework controls in a central work area, allows for the editing of policies as well as evidence-based guidance. It also permits auditors to look over evidence with the use of read-only access.
It doesn’t install agents or connect to infrastructure systems. Customers upload and choose the evidence they want to present.
The system access should be considered. the system’s access.
It is evident that the removal of integrations can be a disadvantage. Someone must collect evidence manually.
The compliance software does not require integration and can be used with no permanent connections to the operating environment.
The design and architecture of one is not superior to the other. It is crucial to determine which choices are best for your company.
CertAssist is targeted towards teams that comprise between five and 200 people and provides pricing information instead of having an actual sales call. The stated launch price for CertAssist is $225 per monthly, as opposed to the usual $375.
Let Complexity Find Its Proper Place
The requirements for a start-up that a 10 person company has today might not be the same for 100 or even 500 employees.
While compliance is simple but a lighter platform might make sense. When systems, employees frameworks, and requirements for evidence increase, the financials could ultimately favor more automation. This is a better way to buy compliance software to let complexity earn its place.
Don’t spend money on fifty integrations simply because they look attractive on a comparison chart. You should pay for them only when the cost of doing the job they replace manually is greater.